Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Home » Legal News » 83 Victims, Family Members Seek $750 Million for Fort Hood Massacre

83 Victims, Family Members Seek $750 Million for Fort Hood Massacre

November 11, 2011 08:22pm  
83 Victims, Family Members Seek $750 Million for Fort Hood Massacre
Eighty-three victims and family members in the Fort Hood shooting are seeking $750 million in compensation from the United States Army, claiming that willful negligence enabled the attacker—Nidal Hasan—to carry out the attack at the military installation. 

The administrative claim filed last week claims the government had precise warnings that Hasan posed a grave danger to the lives of civilians and soldiers stationed on the base. 

The claim suggests that the government ignored the threat Hasan exhibited and instead—because they acquiesced to political correctness—promoted the attacker to the rank of major. The attack, which took the lives of thirteen soldiers and civilians and injured twenty-four more, has prompted fifty-four relatives of eight of the murdered soldier, to file a claim against the Army. 

The government claims that Hasan’s attack was inspired by the radical U.S.-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki—the two men exchanged as many as 20 emails. The claimants point to the irony of this relationship—ak-Awlaki, who was killed in September by a drone strike, was perpetually targeted by the government, while Hasan was promoted. 

In the events leading up to the shooting, a colleague and an instructor at the base each referred to Hasan as a “ticking time bomb.” In classroom presentations, Hasan habitually spoke of violent Islamist extremism and justified suicide bombings. This egregious display of hate and contempt towards the U.S. was ignored by Hasan’s superiors who failed to discipline and/or discharge him. 


Must Read

Gross Negligence Fact You Must Know Gross Negligence Fact You Must Know
What is Gross Negligence? Gross negligence is a severe lack of due diligence on the part of the defendant that represents a lack of concern for the likelihood that injuries will result.
An Easy Guide to Strict Liability Tort An Easy Guide to Strict Liability Tort
What is Strict Liability Tort?Strict liability is the imposition of liability without fault for damages on the defendant.
Comparative Negligence Comparative Negligence
What is Comparative Negligence?Comparative Negligence is a specific legal defense that is commonly used in civil lawsuits.
Negligence In Depth Negligence In Depth
DefinitionNegligence is the failure of an individual or party to adhere to common standards of conduct that results in injury.
Medical Malpractice Cases Medical Malpractice Cases
RES IPSA LOQUITOR; WHAT IS THIS? Res Ipsa Loquitor is a legal doctrine that essentially means, "The thing speaks for itself.